11 Comments

Not being a scientist---could someone please explain the J&J potion of this literature?

Some in my family were given that injection.

Thanks so much.

Expand full comment
author
Oct 30¡edited Oct 30Author

Sure. Unlike fizer, J&J knew not to develop a vaccine that would act act in reverse by shifting your immune response towards a tolerant, anti-inflammatory cytokine Th2 type.

That's not a comment on it's safety or efficacy in other respects.

Expand full comment

Any thoughts on safety?

Expand full comment

Thank you.

Very helpful.

Expand full comment
Oct 30Liked by DoorlessCarp🐭

Oh, and thank you for all of this digging and compiling

Expand full comment
author

Thank you.

Expand full comment
Oct 30Liked by DoorlessCarp🐭

What makes some researchers comfortable with interfering with complex processes they have very limited knowledge of? And what made the upper management of the dod and cia green light and promote/coerce the administration of these counter measures? My family, adult son and daughter had the Pfizer shot and misguidedly gave them to my 3 young grandchildren, who are now constantly ill. They and many of their friends never totally recover from their previous infection before they acquire the next.

Expand full comment

Bioweapon

Expand full comment
Oct 30Liked by DoorlessCarp🐭

Trying to think of a word worse than 'weapon'. Scary thing is -- they're working on more.... ones that may not come in a needle we can refuse.

Expand full comment
author

saRNAs. If, and it's a big IF, they can spread from person to person and then continue to self propagate then this no longer meets any definition of a vaccine or a gene therapy. It's a synthetic virus IMOH.

Expand full comment

the saRNAs seem even more evil IMO. They're trying to overtake bodily autonomy for those who would say no to that option. Reminds me of the genetic engineering of the mosquitos.... unintended consequences. They behave as if they're Gods.

Expand full comment