Excellent article but it reads like a horror story, I have no idea how many mRNA injections my friend and neighbour has had. I asked why was he still taking them only for him to reply they are free and he has had no side effects. I have never seen such blind trust and unless he is told by the health "authorities" he will continue to take them, he is about the same age as me and his general health is deteriorating but he thinks it is part of getting older. The blind trust barrier is almost impossible to break down.
Excellent as always. Itâs difficult to find the time to read many of your articles due to length but Iâm always rewarded for having made the effort. You are a gift to the SS community
Thank you for your support. I try to keep under 10,000 words and avoid over-posting, partly because we all have time pressures and information overload, and partly because they take weeks to research and write.
The data from Finland on excess deaths; the euromomo data for Finland (and Europe overall) as well as the UK ONS data from 2024 is showing excess deaths below the baseline pretty much consistently since February. I realise the ONS made their âimprovementsâ to the data earlier this year but should we dismiss these sources entirely or are we actually seeing excess deaths dropping finally as we distance further from the last mass vaccination rounds. Sadly excess deaths in under 24âs are still high but all other age groups are below baseline. Of course they should be below baseline anyway when so many people were already finished off in 2020-2022, but hoping for a glimmer of positivity it does look like this year has been better from all the official sources. Doesnât factor in all the chronic illness we are seeing but surely at some point as most people are 2-3 years from a last jab, we would expect to see deaths dropping.
Unfortunately this appears to be an artifact from changing the classifications.
Waiting list data from multiple jabbed countries show that the problem is building, not resolving. And this is exactly what you would expect with fibrosis, atherosclerosis, cancer promotion, T cell depletion and class switching, as well as repeat infections from a prionogenic chimera with HIV inserts.
What is your view on non-mRNA vaccines? I see loads of respiratory viruses and bacterial infections here in China but anecdotally I donât see the same increase in cancers and autoimmune disease. Although we are also a year behind the rest of the world
By waiting lists you mean more people with illnesses that could be caused by IgG4? So the less deaths is (if itâs a thing) a temporary lull as longer term chronic infections lead to a never ending constant flow of illness and death
"we need to increase awareness of the health risks caused by mRNA GeneTech-induced IgG4 class switching"
To do that, you will need to heavily simplify the concepts to make it accessible to the general public. 99% won't even know what 'mRNA' or 'IgG4' means. They'll understand 'mRNA is what those shots contain' (quoting Idiocracy: "It's got what plants crave! It's got electrolytes!").
This typically means ditching the jargon, acronyms (or, trying to Richard Feynman the explanations), and *really* dumbing it down to the level a child would talk about. It's why the pharmaceutical companies stuck to the dumbest, most basic, repetitive brainwashing mantra of 'safe and effective'.
Something akin would be: weakening immunity harms the heart.
Your technical self will probably repulse at the gross oversimplification, but honestly, many people really struggle to grasp technical terminology. I say this as a guy who often acted as a "translator" between extremely complex situations and, well... management.
You can always explain further if they ask any questions like 'how?'. But don't see that as an invite to get technical either - what they mean is a *slightly* more detailed response. 'The shots weaken immunity in a way that leads to heart harms', would be a follow up. You very painfully climb the ladder until you reach their threshold of understanding (in my experience, almost no-one asks 'how?' besides angry skeptics trying to "deboonk").
Absolutely. Distilling down complexity to simpler concepts for the everyman to grasp. Something along the lines of "it makes your body attack itself", or answering suitable for "tell it me like I'm 5".
It does become a bit like asking an isolated desert dweller to imagine snow. We need to understand it ourselves first, and then ideally prepare explanatory presentations or something. But it defies oversimplification and you mustn't talk down..
I am reminded of the Blaise Pascal quote âI have made this [letter] longer than usual because I have not had time to make it shorter.â
Tell me like I am 5 so I can better explain to dear friends and relatives who respond with "I've had six shots and I'm fine" or "Millions of people have been vacinated, if there was a problem we would know about it by now" etc. Something like...
It makes your body attack itself
Really. How?
Well, one way is through IgG4 class switching. Instead of the intended pool of spike-specific neutralizing IgG antibodies, a pool of antibodies associated with spike-specific tolerance are dominant in multiply-injected people. And the phagocytic enabling capacities are much reduced overall. These activities lead to clearance of viral pathogens. Reduce them â reduction in viral clearance capacity.
Thanks! The BIG problem we have with IgG4 is that the Fc is not antigen specific to just Spike, for example. It can bind IgG1, which is very bad, and we put this in our review, Mikolaj included a figure.
This was from 2020:
An immune evasion mechanism with IgG4 playing an essential role in cancer and implication for immunotherapy
What i was hoping for was a bit of the review of the classes . I kind of read it once and forgot it. I kind of recall that the Igg4 was a big deal cause it means bad things relating to sone kind of autonomic process. Cause igg4 is seen in autoimmunity conditions. But i dont really get it. It seems more of something when in context of the other classes. I still read through the post and just put my kind of sorta idea in abox a apply what i read to it. Thanks for your work. A post of yours is always a must read
It might sound like talking down, but I often find I always underestimate how much simplification is required. In-fact, the biggest risk from knowledgeable/intellectual circles is the 'hidden assumptions'.
So information that you already know, you assume the other person knows ("because it's so obvious!") but actually for them it is a *hidden* assumption they're not aware of.
For example, a lot of clinicians in hospitals don't know what the interior of a computer looks like. So you might assume they already know what a CPU is or what even an AI 'is' because everybody on the internet talks about it; but you might find all they do is live and breathe their specific medical silo and nothing else, and have no idea what a CPU even is.
In-fact, there's a prevailing assumption among some that computers are basically psychic. They'll say 'why doesn't software package just automatically input the patient ID?', to which you have to challenge them with a 'How will the computer know what the correct patient ID is?', to which they'll pause and eventually go '...because it'll be the one I'll type in!' (I.E. not automatic).
For me I struggle with a lot of the scientific terminology. If you mentioned methylated mRNA-LNPs triggering IgG4 class switching to me in early 2020 I'd have no idea what you were talking about. Simplifying statements isn't talking down, it is making complex knowledge accessible (Richard Feynman famously dropped an O-ring into cold water without saying anything to demonstrate the issue of expansion that caused the Challenger disaster).
I agree we all need to do this. But with IgG4 & RA we don't understand it ourselves yet. Well I've mapped it out but it took several hours and needs to be worked through step by step, - too much to footnote these case reports with.
If viral infection in the heart causes myocarditis, what happens to myocarditis rates when immune system does not adequately defend against viral infections in the heart?
NIH deleted the fatality rate of viral myocarditis for a reason. I think they know something.
Great research, many thanks for your dedication. Iâve always thought a âvaccineâ that turns our human cells into viral antigens, would not be good for the host, completely messing up our complement system, as described.
My head isn't into reading this right now, but... Galectin-3 mentioned early ... Pectin and lactose, milk sugar, are inhibitors. Pectin is in apples, and the pith of citrus or pomegranate peel. I have posts on that topic.
My buddy "Gary" said that flu vax was substantially reformulate in 2004 and coupled with an increased effort/requirements to pump more injections into arms.
Excellent article but it reads like a horror story, I have no idea how many mRNA injections my friend and neighbour has had. I asked why was he still taking them only for him to reply they are free and he has had no side effects. I have never seen such blind trust and unless he is told by the health "authorities" he will continue to take them, he is about the same age as me and his general health is deteriorating but he thinks it is part of getting older. The blind trust barrier is almost impossible to break down.
âMen, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, one by one.â
â Charles MacKay, Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds
.
Even Pavlovâs Dog
Would Have Figured Out This Charade
And Turned On Its Owner.
Now The Salient Question Is:
How Many Viscous Bites
Would It Take The Doctor
To Turn On Its Owner ?
https://www.quantamagazine.org/the-brainstem-fine-tunes-inflammation-throughout-the-body-20240614/
and something else to worry about as the spike messes up the BBB
Excellent as always. Itâs difficult to find the time to read many of your articles due to length but Iâm always rewarded for having made the effort. You are a gift to the SS community
Thank you for your support. I try to keep under 10,000 words and avoid over-posting, partly because we all have time pressures and information overload, and partly because they take weeks to research and write.
The data from Finland on excess deaths; the euromomo data for Finland (and Europe overall) as well as the UK ONS data from 2024 is showing excess deaths below the baseline pretty much consistently since February. I realise the ONS made their âimprovementsâ to the data earlier this year but should we dismiss these sources entirely or are we actually seeing excess deaths dropping finally as we distance further from the last mass vaccination rounds. Sadly excess deaths in under 24âs are still high but all other age groups are below baseline. Of course they should be below baseline anyway when so many people were already finished off in 2020-2022, but hoping for a glimmer of positivity it does look like this year has been better from all the official sources. Doesnât factor in all the chronic illness we are seeing but surely at some point as most people are 2-3 years from a last jab, we would expect to see deaths dropping.
Unfortunately this appears to be an artifact from changing the classifications.
Waiting list data from multiple jabbed countries show that the problem is building, not resolving. And this is exactly what you would expect with fibrosis, atherosclerosis, cancer promotion, T cell depletion and class switching, as well as repeat infections from a prionogenic chimera with HIV inserts.
What is your view on non-mRNA vaccines? I see loads of respiratory viruses and bacterial infections here in China but anecdotally I donât see the same increase in cancers and autoimmune disease. Although we are also a year behind the rest of the world
You don't get class switching with non mRNA gene agents, but the Spike is still cytotoxic.
Autoimmune disorders and cancers will tend to lag other conditions by years (or decades with some hard tissue cancers).
Accelerated aging is perhaps a good description.
By waiting lists you mean more people with illnesses that could be caused by IgG4? So the less deaths is (if itâs a thing) a temporary lull as longer term chronic infections lead to a never ending constant flow of illness and death
You might like
https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/igg4-affected-by-endotoxin-in-mrna
Thanks Geoff!
"we need to increase awareness of the health risks caused by mRNA GeneTech-induced IgG4 class switching"
To do that, you will need to heavily simplify the concepts to make it accessible to the general public. 99% won't even know what 'mRNA' or 'IgG4' means. They'll understand 'mRNA is what those shots contain' (quoting Idiocracy: "It's got what plants crave! It's got electrolytes!").
This typically means ditching the jargon, acronyms (or, trying to Richard Feynman the explanations), and *really* dumbing it down to the level a child would talk about. It's why the pharmaceutical companies stuck to the dumbest, most basic, repetitive brainwashing mantra of 'safe and effective'.
Something akin would be: weakening immunity harms the heart.
Your technical self will probably repulse at the gross oversimplification, but honestly, many people really struggle to grasp technical terminology. I say this as a guy who often acted as a "translator" between extremely complex situations and, well... management.
You can always explain further if they ask any questions like 'how?'. But don't see that as an invite to get technical either - what they mean is a *slightly* more detailed response. 'The shots weaken immunity in a way that leads to heart harms', would be a follow up. You very painfully climb the ladder until you reach their threshold of understanding (in my experience, almost no-one asks 'how?' besides angry skeptics trying to "deboonk").
Absolutely. Distilling down complexity to simpler concepts for the everyman to grasp. Something along the lines of "it makes your body attack itself", or answering suitable for "tell it me like I'm 5".
It does become a bit like asking an isolated desert dweller to imagine snow. We need to understand it ourselves first, and then ideally prepare explanatory presentations or something. But it defies oversimplification and you mustn't talk down..
I am reminded of the Blaise Pascal quote âI have made this [letter] longer than usual because I have not had time to make it shorter.â
Tell me like I am 5 so I can better explain to dear friends and relatives who respond with "I've had six shots and I'm fine" or "Millions of people have been vacinated, if there was a problem we would know about it by now" etc. Something like...
It makes your body attack itself
Really. How?
Well, one way is through IgG4 class switching. Instead of the intended pool of spike-specific neutralizing IgG antibodies, a pool of antibodies associated with spike-specific tolerance are dominant in multiply-injected people. And the phagocytic enabling capacities are much reduced overall. These activities lead to clearance of viral pathogens. Reduce them â reduction in viral clearance capacity.
Thanks! The BIG problem we have with IgG4 is that the Fc is not antigen specific to just Spike, for example. It can bind IgG1, which is very bad, and we put this in our review, Mikolaj included a figure.
This was from 2020:
An immune evasion mechanism with IgG4 playing an essential role in cancer and implication for immunotherapy
https://jitc.bmj.com/content/8/2/e000661
What i was hoping for was a bit of the review of the classes . I kind of read it once and forgot it. I kind of recall that the Igg4 was a big deal cause it means bad things relating to sone kind of autonomic process. Cause igg4 is seen in autoimmunity conditions. But i dont really get it. It seems more of something when in context of the other classes. I still read through the post and just put my kind of sorta idea in abox a apply what i read to it. Thanks for your work. A post of yours is always a must read
Thank you. I will add this to the Background, Jessica wrote an excellent primer to the problem:
The immunological mechanism of action for lost immunity, a shift to tolerance (and autoimmunity?) from the shots
https://jessicar.substack.com/p/the-immunological-mechanism-of-action?utm_source=substack&utm_campaign=posts-open-in-app&utm_medium=web&triedRedirect=true
Ah yes, that is where I read about. Good link
Section added as a revision.
It might sound like talking down, but I often find I always underestimate how much simplification is required. In-fact, the biggest risk from knowledgeable/intellectual circles is the 'hidden assumptions'.
So information that you already know, you assume the other person knows ("because it's so obvious!") but actually for them it is a *hidden* assumption they're not aware of.
For example, a lot of clinicians in hospitals don't know what the interior of a computer looks like. So you might assume they already know what a CPU is or what even an AI 'is' because everybody on the internet talks about it; but you might find all they do is live and breathe their specific medical silo and nothing else, and have no idea what a CPU even is.
In-fact, there's a prevailing assumption among some that computers are basically psychic. They'll say 'why doesn't software package just automatically input the patient ID?', to which you have to challenge them with a 'How will the computer know what the correct patient ID is?', to which they'll pause and eventually go '...because it'll be the one I'll type in!' (I.E. not automatic).
For me I struggle with a lot of the scientific terminology. If you mentioned methylated mRNA-LNPs triggering IgG4 class switching to me in early 2020 I'd have no idea what you were talking about. Simplifying statements isn't talking down, it is making complex knowledge accessible (Richard Feynman famously dropped an O-ring into cold water without saying anything to demonstrate the issue of expansion that caused the Challenger disaster).
I agree we all need to do this. But with IgG4 & RA we don't understand it ourselves yet. Well I've mapped it out but it took several hours and needs to be worked through step by step, - too much to footnote these case reports with.
I'd propose the following hypothesis-question:
If viral infection in the heart causes myocarditis, what happens to myocarditis rates when immune system does not adequately defend against viral infections in the heart?
NIH deleted the fatality rate of viral myocarditis for a reason. I think they know something.
https://thedailybeagle.substack.com/p/nih-deletes-myocarditis-fatality
It's what bitcoin is to me. They always say don't invest in something you cannot describe adequately in one sentence.
I'd describe in a single sentence but my conclusion is still 'don't invest'.
Digital number go up based on speed/number of cracked cryptographic codes.
As for why not:
Globalist trojan horse currency backed by nothing tracks all transactions: stops working when the lights go out.
Yeah, that is my take as well. Basically the same people running the next level of the same game . Ok , the kids of the same people
Great research, many thanks for your dedication. Iâve always thought a âvaccineâ that turns our human cells into viral antigens, would not be good for the host, completely messing up our complement system, as described.
My head isn't into reading this right now, but... Galectin-3 mentioned early ... Pectin and lactose, milk sugar, are inhibitors. Pectin is in apples, and the pith of citrus or pomegranate peel. I have posts on that topic.
My buddy "Gary" said that flu vax was substantially reformulate in 2004 and coupled with an increased effort/requirements to pump more injections into arms.
Iirc, that was around the same time that cdc combined flu deaths with pneumonia. Biologically might make sense but it inflates the flu aspect.
Gary Philip Turner the 4th. đ
Excellent articleâŚthank you!