29 Comments

Arcturus Therapeutics Inc. is making saRNA stuff, too. They had a supply agreement with the Israel Ministry of Health in August 2020!

https://contracts.justia.com/companies/arcturus-therapeutics-holdings-inc-6445/contract/137750/

Expand full comment

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/laninf/article/PIIS1473-3099(23)00650-3/fulltext

Tens of Thousands have already been injected with saRNA therapeutics. Seems someone turned over Pandora's Box and shook it violently to make sure every last thing will come out.

Expand full comment

And here is the fucking joke: "All participants provided written informed consent before enrolment.". Sure they did.

Expand full comment
author

Written consent, not being the same as informed consent, which isn't possible at this stage.

Expand full comment

It specifically says "written INFORMED consent"...

Expand full comment
Nov 16Liked by DoorlessCarp🐭

It could still get argued in a court of law, but that doesn't help the victims😉🤦‍♀️

Expand full comment

Their other saRNA vaccine got approval in Japan in November 2023. They were testing that stuff at least since 2020.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ARCT-154

2020-08-04: "Ascending Dose Study of Investigational SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine ARCT-021 in Healthy Adult Subjects" https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04480957

2021-08-30: "A Trial Evaluating the Safety and Immunogenicity of 3 COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 RNA Vaccines in Healthy Adults"

https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05037097?term=ARCT-021&rank=4

Expand full comment
Nov 16Liked by DoorlessCarp🐭

💯👏👏👌🙏 Nice work!

Your probably right, but respectfully, I don't think I'll hold my breath until the samRNA shot attempts are "dead in the water".😐🤔🤦‍♂️ Japan already floated their attempt.

That lovely little COI, samRNA crew are riding the "little train that could", and they are just stupid enough to "keep going, to flatten the curve". I mean they've been riding the "booster" train for almost 3yrs now.😐😐

If they were going to jump off the crazy car, they would've exited by now. They be all in, for all time. BTJMO😥😑

Expand full comment
Nov 16Liked by DoorlessCarp🐭

Being used in vaxes for pets. No longer interested in jabbing my cats, and doing my best to wiggle out of vaxing for the rabies (forced by law, at least unless I can prove by titers they have immunity, which unfortunately most VETS won't accept OR perform the titers for you... sad but true. More interested in the dollars for the jabs that routine and regular bring in for them.)

Expand full comment
author
Nov 16¡edited Nov 16Author

Agreed, they are going all in with this crap. That's why they are still spending billions on factorys which will turn out to be white elephants🐘

The Next Big Thing is using these instead of antibiotics, eg against MRSA. Of course you cannot wait until you are ill to take them. Oh no. You need to be the Worried Well and jabbed like a pincushion against a dozen things that might happen. The twist being that they help destroy your immune system, especially in those that need them most.

Expand full comment

And then that *might* turns into near certainty... Young woman in my office, jabbed n boosted democrat to the max, states she has colon issues now polyps removed etc she's on the crazy train and I can't help but wonder... is she developing IBD and/or colon cancer? Test after test, procedure after procedure... its no way to live.

Expand full comment
Nov 18Liked by DoorlessCarp🐭

Nurses I met last month from southern California told me they now are filling up with cancer patients and mostly all among young adults

Expand full comment
author

That is awful, but unfortunately not unexpected.

And I suspect they are almost all being gaslit & clueless.

At some point rationing of healthcare becomes inevitable, if not already.

Expand full comment

Actually for draining the fiat money hospitals in the know were already building new pediatric wings, and others, cancer wards. They needed to be rewarded, especially the CEO's.

Expand full comment
Nov 16Liked by DoorlessCarp🐭

These shots are terrain/microbial nukes. They specifically target the mitochondria and any commensal bacteria/virae & screw up the synergistic protections normally enabled. Which has wreaked havoc on the individuals with dysbiosis already (Which is 98% of populations, thanks to glysophate).You see this in the preferential distribution. Colon cancer, is no longer an old man's disease, it once was. They could not have designed a more perfect mitochondrial bioweapon.😉

Expand full comment
author

Low Level Chronic Glyphosate Harms in Fetal Development and Reproductive Toxicity

45 scientific papers to encourage you to stop buying conventional foods

https://www.malone.news/p/low-level-chronic-glyphosate-harms

Expand full comment
author

I cannot buy tar oils to winter wash my apple tree because "cancer", but I can liberally water glyphosate everywhere round it and eat the fruit. Riiiight🤷

Expand full comment

Will lavender or tea tree oils or eucalyptus oil work? I never have tried or researched it.

Expand full comment
Nov 16Liked by DoorlessCarp🐭

Yeah, my gut tells me that the preexisting "Antimicrobial Resistance Task Force" will be jumping on the train as WHO's lil darlings. Yes we have a resistance issue, have for at least 40yrs now, and we've just been kicking the can down the road. However, I think this tech will be used as a reason to justify the increased deaths from AMR. Potentially being a catch 22- Peeps immune systems are crashing, they buy this terribly stupid tech (samRNA), apply said tech and then the ADE will conceal the excess deaths, under the cover of AMR, and pooof! Any objections to the IRH Amendments and Pandemic Prepardness Treaties, fly out the window as the countries rush to hand the keys to the kingdom to Tedros and WHO pals.🤦‍♂️😐😑But again, TJMO!

Keep doing what you do DC, and know there are many who appreciate it. Especially the detail.

Expand full comment
Nov 16Liked by DoorlessCarp🐭

way above my pay grade, but do carry on!

Expand full comment

Thank you for your dedication and research. What is so insidious about this technology is that it is a wolf dressed in sheep’s clothing. By simply calling it a vaccine people put it into their minds as a preventative therapy, when it neither prevents infection or transmission, yet I see talking heads on YouTube laughing at RFK jnr as an antivaxer, when he is just an anti gene therapy anti Vaxer. It’s very disturbing to be caught inside this Fauci psy-ops machine, with no way out, so I wrote and published a book, Pandoras Box!

Expand full comment
author
Nov 16¡edited Nov 16Author

Thanks Geoff.

Without being an anti-vaxxer (eg I would take the Yellow Fever jab if I was travelling to a high risk country) you can see that, as with the mRNA technology, it's not fit for purpose. It/they fail because of the original sin - in order to stimulate the immune response it needs to suppress immune responses to avoid rapid destruction or over stimulation.

Economic removal of adulterants is another original sin that is inherent to these products. It's convenient to leave dsRNA, dsDNA, SV40p and LPS as no-cost adjuvants, regardless of safety implications.

And we aren't even getting to what happens next. Our Consultant was an expert on mucosal immunity and must have known that none of these products stimulate IgA. That's a failure in my opinion, regardless of anything else.

Expand full comment

The greatest ripoff ever and they aren't through yet.

Expand full comment

It's more like a complete cell therapy. Restructuring membrane in penetrating it with this unnatarual positive charged fat balls sounds like the most stupid idea one can have: Leads you downstream to genexpression profile alteration far beyond good and evil.

Expand full comment

Pfizer's preferred "adjuvant" Endotoxin Lipid A is a feature of the Imperial College professor's work on IgG.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Shattock+IgG+lipopolysaccharide

Expand full comment
Nov 15Liked by DoorlessCarp🐭

Strange you should mention that FOIA. I stumbled across it whilst eyeballing FOIAs for write-ups. The FOIA is incomplete, despite claims to the contrary. There's reference to a prior message/contact but it's not included in the FOIA. Maybe the UCL researcher in question kept it off the record books in another medium? WhatsApp, DM, text message, or some other backhanded deal.

Newsguard colluding to censor rather than "verify". More like Legacyguard. Guarding the old deceitful decrepit pieces of shit.

Expand full comment
author

You are correct. I know it's incomplete as I forwarded on an email to them which I didn't see again anywhere.

Expand full comment

Small world, didn't realise you filed the FOIA.

Expand full comment