"As is the norm these days, no article is allowed to conclude without a pro-vaccination spin. Even though the body of the preceding text was all about why that is a particularly bad idea that fails repeatedly..."
I've noticed this too; apparently it's the only way to get published.
Yes the extent to which this level of glycosylation & fusogenicity contributes to real world observed pathogenicity remains to be seen. It is theoretical until observed, and observed in many cases. I sincerely hope it's not!
Other parts of the virus like the Nucleocapsid haven't mutated that much, so the unjabbed DO have some immunity against these new variants.
BA 2.1. point...something and BA. 4 and 5 are going to make really hard to mess with the data.
"As is the norm these days, no article is allowed to conclude without a pro-vaccination spin. Even though the body of the preceding text was all about why that is a particularly bad idea that fails repeatedly..."
I've noticed this too; apparently it's the only way to get published.
Clowns in Academia
It is the only way to get published, even when the entire data points to other conclusions.
Yes the extent to which this level of glycosylation & fusogenicity contributes to real world observed pathogenicity remains to be seen. It is theoretical until observed, and observed in many cases. I sincerely hope it's not!
And once observed, this discussion becomes theoretical.